tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4266300416434206693.post8890792964274879711..comments2023-08-11T12:04:42.077+02:00Comments on The Church of Rationality: A Case against a Conservative Case against Gay Marriage, Pt. 2LemmusLemmushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00917054221547240969noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4266300416434206693.post-37463156081660238972009-05-11T19:59:00.000+02:002009-05-11T19:59:00.000+02:00Can't we just make up an equally (i.e. not very pl...Can't we just make up an equally (i.e. not very plausible) counter or opposite argument.<br /><br />Say, that the underclass aspire to heterosexual marriage, but, statistically they're unlikely to achieve it, or maintain it - this will leave them disillusioned and demotivated - therefore we should do all we can to <I>undermine</I> the institution of heterosexual marriage.pjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06832177812057826894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4266300416434206693.post-73367233122147959042009-05-08T15:45:00.000+02:002009-05-08T15:45:00.000+02:00Wow, the IQ argument against same-sex marriage is ...Wow, the IQ argument against same-sex marriage is so convoluted it's almost surreal. I don't even know where to begin with that. <br /><br />I'll just say this: yeah, people need "institutions to aspire to."<br /><br />Well, some people are gay. Whether anyone likes it or not, they just ARE gay. <br /><br />Shouldn't THEY have an institution to aspire to?John Althouse Cohenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11703450281424023177noreply@blogger.com