Showing posts with label Quotes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quotes. Show all posts

13/10/2011

Question of the Day

Nassim Taleb describes [Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahnemann] as “in the same league as The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith and The Interpretation of Dreams by Sigmund Freud”. What does this tell us about Taleb?
That's a comment at Marginal Revolution by Ian Leslie; here's his blog. I'm halfway through The Black Swan, and it's got interesting ideas, but, man, it's wordy. Extrapolating from the first half, it seems that a hundred pages instead of the 400 he managed to fill would have done fine.

12/06/2011

Fireworks, or, How Is Michael Bay Like James Joyce?

I've grown amazed over the years by how condescending many high-toned people are towards storytelling -- storytelling as in narrative, plot, etc. Can they really think that the creation of a galvanizing-or-amusing narrative is a minor achievement? Can they really take the existence of a story that holds your attention and delivers a few satisfying surprises for granted? [...]

Though I now marvel at this attitude, I confess that I once shared it. During college, grad school, and for a few years after -- when else? -- I thought of storytelling as a kind of unfortunate necessity that, perversely, fiction required. In this view, story is the clothesline you hang your artistry on; further, the "art" in a given work is to be found in deploying the artistry, not in creating the clothesline.

Michael Blowhard, "Story"


[T]he key thing about Michael Bay movies is that they are not designed to tell stories. The narrative elements in The Rock, character, plot, dialogue, are there as signals in a sort of cinematic aggressive mimicry. He's making amusement park rides that look like movies.

Matthew Desseem, "#103: The Rock"

16/07/2010

Nor Should You Test Empirically Whether You Can Fly

[O]nly the good doubt their own goodness, which is what makes them good in the first place. The bad know they are good, but the good know nothing.
Paul Auster, Man in the Dark, p. 77

Hey, you could write boatloads of essays about that quotation, but what it reminded me of was breaking up with a girlfriend years back. I had rather good reasons and tried to express them as well as I could until, deep into our long and rather unpleasant exchange, she asked: "So you're saying I'm a bad person?" I was delighted that she had managed to express the gist of my winding explanations so succinctly in a pang of insight and answered in the full affirmative only to find that she had meant the question as a kind of reductio ad absurdum. Have you ever tried to convince someone she's a bad person? This is the sentence in which I'm supposed to say that that's one of those things you should do once in your life, but really, it isn't. Zero is the number of times I recommend.

28/06/2010

Comfort

As the Daily Mail wrote on the morning of the 1966 World Cup final day:
West Germany may beat us at our national sport today, but that would be only fair. We beat them twice at theirs.
And England won that match, too!

22/05/2010

In Yo Face, Talcott: The Social Science Theory of Everything Is Nigh

There is an erroneous tendency to rank title races basically exclusively on the drama contained in their denouements – even devastatingly urbane, thrilling metrosexual types make such a mistake – when, really, the very best of the genre involve a remorseless pursuit of the prize over a number of months of sustained excellence.

The best examples in England are 1998-99 and 2001-02, but they can't hold a candle to what we have seen in Spain these last few months. Nor, obviously, can this season's Premier League race. If the La Liga campaign has been like watching two devastatingly urbane, thrilling metrosexual gentlemen in the very sharpest suits engage in an all-night verbal joust for the hand of the fairest maiden, the 2009-10 Premier League season has been more like watching a triumvirate of leering, sweating pissartists counting their change in front of an increasingly bored hooker.

Still, paragraphs are paragraphs and they get a bit boring sometimes. Here, instead, are some statistics to show how astonishingly good a race this has been:

• Real Madrid have won 17 of their last 18 games and Barcelona 17 of their last 20
• Real Madrid, who have 92 points with two games to play, could finish with 98 points and not win the league; in 1999-2000, Deportivo la Coruna won the league with 69 points
• Real Madrid could finish the season with 19 wins in 20 games and not win the bloody league!
• If Barcelona and Real win their last two games they will finish with 99 and 98 points. 99+98 = 197. Even Scotland, supposedly the home of the two-horse race, can't beat that: the record is 194 in 2002-03
• Since La Liga went to 38 games a season and three points a win, there has only been one previous instance of two sides finishing with 80 points in the season, never mind 90, never mind 98
• Barcelona have already beaten the record for points in a La Liga season: Real's 92 in 1996-97. And that was in a 42-game season. Real have already beaten the record for wins in a La Liga season: Barcelona's 28, also in 1996-97.
That's Rob Smyth's theory of football title races, nay, sports contests, nay, all contests, nay, all narratives. Aw, fuck, isn't this somehow relevant for all of utility theory, plus the psychology of memory? At the very least?

23/04/2010

We Read Books So You Don't Have to: Misappreciation of Professional Tastes Dept.

I sat for a while on a bench and waited to see if anything would happen. Gulls swooped and cried. On a nearby yacht the wind rattled the cables against a metal mast. There was hammering in the distance as property was renovated for the summer. An old guy walked a dog. Apart from that, nothing occured in almost an hour which could possibly have distracted an author from his work. It was a non-writer's idea of a writer's paradise.
That's from Robert Harris's Ghost (p. 59) - I missed the movie, so I thought I'd read the book. I'm about one fifth in and so far it's really good. Soon, I trust, creepy stuff is going to happen.

P.S.: A good reason not to major in sociology is that people think that "as a sociologist, you must find this stuff terribly interesting," where "this stuff" can stand for pretty much anything that can happen in a society.

21/04/2010

Against Concision, i.e., a Critical Evaluation of the Elliptic Style

Take Hemingway. People always think that the reason he's easy to read is that he is concise. He isn't. I hate conciseness -- it's too difficult. The reason Hemingway is easy to read is that he repeats himself all the time, using 'and' for padding.
That's Tom Wolfe, from Michelle Kerns's "The 50 best author vs. author put-downs of all time, Part 2" and not otherwise sourced. The quote nicely demonstrates Marcel Reich-Ranicki's wisdom on the issue: If there's one group of people whose negative evaluations of fiction writers you shouldn't believe, it's fiction writers. That's because they have a strong tendency to see their own approach to literature as the one best way and view all digressions from it as mistakes. Wolfe's approach is nicely summarized in his introduction to The Bonfire of the Vanities, which I strongly recommend even if you won't agree. And here's Wolfe's "The 'Me' Decade and the Third Great Awakening", which has much of sociological interest.

05/01/2010

O.k., I'm giving up (Previously entitled "The Dumping Ground")

I recently promised that all the missing reviews of films and books I consumed in 2009 and hadn't reviewed yet would be coming up. Well, they're not - it's about time the old year came to a close and I'm too lazy. (The best films of the noughties list is still coming, but I'll have to watch Avatar and Where the Wild Things Are first because there is a nontrivial chance at least one of them'll make it onto the list. The posts will be at the new movie blog, where my reviewing discipline so far has been a-hurray despite my being on a bit of a moviewatching bender these weeks, but you'll be properly alerted here.) Short movie reviews I'd already written are below.

The best new film I saw in 2009 - a weak year for films - was Revolutionary Road, which I sort of reviewed here. However, that already premiered in the US in 2008; the best new-new film of 2009 for me was Inglourious Basterds (8/10). You may have heard about it, I'll just add that (a) it has nothing to do with Germany or the Nazis per se and (b) it is not too long; in fact, its lack of tempo is one of its qualities (cf. Jackie Brown).

The best old film I saw for the first time in 2009 was Hiroshima mon amour (Wikipedia). I'm giving it 9/10, but be warned that it also gets a 4 on the Artsy-Fartsy-Meter. Honourable mention: Dressed to Kill, which gets a short review below.

I don't think I read a newly published novel in 2009. The prize for the best older novel I read in 2009 is shared by Ian McEwan's Saturday and The Hours by Michael Cunningham (9/10 each). I'll outsource information on Saturday, the greatness of which I find hard to describe, to Wikipedia again; as for The Hours, here comes a quote I typed down earlier. If you like it, you'll like the book:
It seems suddenly easy to bake a cake, to raise a child. She loves her son purely, as mothers do - she doesn not resent him, does not wish to leave. She loves her husband, and is glad to be married. It seems possible (it doesn not seem impossible) that she's slipped across an invisible line, the line that has always separated her from what she would prefer to feel, who she would prefer to be. It does not seem impossible that she has undergone a subtle but porfound transformation, here in this kitchen, at this most ordinary of moments: She has caught up with herself. She has worked so long, so hard, in such good faith, and now she's gotten the knack of living happily, as herself, the way a child learns at a particular moment to balance on a two-wheel bicycle. It seems she will be fine. She will not lose hope. She will not mourn her lost possibilities, her unexplored talents (what if she has no talents, after all?). She wil remein devoted to her son, her husband, her home and duties, all her gifts. She will want this second child.
That's right: feelgood book of the year.

More luck next year. Oh, and posts in which I actually utter something approaching original thought are coming up. I think.

***Short Movie Reviews***

Angels with Dirty Faces (1938): When Rocky Sullivan returns to his Irish-American working class neighbourhood after serving time, his first stop is his old friend Jerry Connolly's. Jerry, who used to be Rocky's partner in crime, is now the neighbourhood's priest, but Rocky does not intend to go straight. - Tightly scripted by no less than five authors and expertly directed by Michael "I make three pictures a year" Curtiz, this is a well-executed gangster picture that looks way more modern than the 1932 Scarface. (7/10)

Suspicion
(1941):
Let's call it the Werther problem: A piece of fiction can't work if it depends on you caring about the main character and that character is unlikable. In this Hitchcock thriller - it's the one with the milk glass - we're supposed to be afraid for Joan Fontaine's Lina. But most of the time I just wanted to slap her in the face and shout: "Oi! Wake up!" In fact, I still feel like it. (5/10)

It's a Wonderful Life (1946): Holy Moly! If they would have called the evil banker Rosenzweig instead of Potter, this film might be banned in Germany along with Mein Kampf. Somebody else write a Ph.D. thesis about how this anti-capitalist propaganda piece became one of America's favourite films. I'll just note that it's a sentimental, visually uninteresting, cliché-ridden movie that, nonetheless, is not wholly unentertaining (6/10). Idea for a screenplay: Somebody gets shown what would have happened had he never been born and the results are so-so.

The Paradine Case (1947): Lawyer falls for attractive eastern European defendant in homicide case, and his wife's not delighted about it. The marital disagreement portion of the plot is a bit flat and the music's poor, but it has the proper shadowplay one expects from a b/w picture and lots of court scenes at the end. (7/10)

The Asphalt Jungle (1950): I liked this movie better than most films noir, but why? Are the streets darker? The women blonder? The men more desperate? Seriously, I can't tell you, but it's just that bit above most contenders. (8/10)

The Thing from Another World (1951): Up north, a team of American hotshots finds man in funny suit vegetable vampire encased in ice. Ice melts, conflict ensues. This 1950s B-movie, which, contrary to popular belief, may have nothing to do with fear of the commies at all, was exactly what I thought it would be. In fact, I don't think any film ever lived up to my expectations so perfectly. (unrated)

The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951): In contrast, this film, in which a spaceman lands on earth and tells its inhabitants he'll blow it apart if they don't start to live in peace is trashy in a boring way. Considered a classic in the USA, which must be one of the great mysteries of film appreciation. (3.5/10)

Le Cercle Rouge (The Red Circle) (1970): Shot in the subdued colours that I associate with crime movies of the same era set in New York, this French gangster film portrays a society of men in which there is little talk, and no hope. The right thing to watch for people who assume all heist movies are like Ocean's Eleven. (6.5/10)

Dressed to Kill (1980): This serial killer thriller film makes quite explicit references to Psycho, but with its subdued atmosphere, excellent cinematography and masterful use of music it is overall more evocative of a better Hitchcok movie; Vertigo. Trying to emulate a masterpiece can go badly wrong or, as in this case, wonderfully right. Probably one of my ten favourite films from the eighties. (8.5/10)

Escape from New York (1981): Early 1980s trash in all its glory. Each copy of the film should come with a big fat reefer so one can actually enjoy this. (4/10)

Outland (1981): High Noon in space. Sports a nice, probably Alien-inspired dark-/shabbyness, but towards the end the implausibilities start piling up. If you like Sean Connery. (6/10)

Boyz n the Hood (1991): This black ghetto film's loosely-structured narrative moves along nicely, but it's visually unimpressive and the synthesizer soundtrack warrants a point deduction. May make for interesting discussion material in a sociology course. (6/10)

The Nightmare before Christmas (1993): It's pretty simple, I think. However much you like this film visually, that's how much you're going to like it. Fun fact: Despite being also known as Tim Burton's The Nightmare before Christmas, this was not actually directed by Tim Burton. (7/10)

Factotum (2005): One might praise this adaption of Bukowski's book of the same name for not striving to look as grubby as Barfly, or alternatively one might wonder if Chinaski's beard isn't too neatly trimmed and the rooms he rents don't look too nice for an alcoholic with no money. But either way, it's not really important. Much in the manner of Bukowski's books, this moves along nicely without any direction, one anecdote after the other. (7/10)

Stranger Than Fiction (2006): This film, one guesses, was pitched as a crossover between The Truman Show and Being John Malkovich: IRS auditor Harold leads the aspergery, dull life one imagines an IRS type to lead until two things happen, more or less simultaneously: He falls in love with the conscientous tax objector Anna, and he hears a voice that narrates his life - it turns out Harold is a character in the new novel being written by renowned author Karen Eiffel, who has trouble coming up with a good way of killing Harold off. - The script could have done with a rewrite, including a bit of a demainstreaming. Three examples: 1. Harold's apartment is wrecked, he complains, and it turns out that, oops, the wreckers have the wrong address. 2. Why Harold falls for Maggie Gyllenhaal's Bambi-eyed Anna is no mystery, that she falls for him is harder to believe than the premise of the film. 3. This problem could have been averted if the filmmakers would have cared to give us an IRS auditor that is more than just a cut-out. - Yet the premise is a good one and the film features cinematography that is pleasing without drawing attention to itself, expert use of pop music, a deadpan performance by Dustin Hoffman as a professor of literature and one of the best two-liners I've heard in a long while. (6.5/10)

Frost/Nixon (2008): About the interviews in which Frost made Nixon say that "when the President does it, that means it's not illegal". The series of four dialogues is quite explicitly presented as a combat between the two men (and their respective teams) - and it's clear where our sympathies lie. Frost/Nixon has the advantage over war or sports films that it can show the likable ones lose each and every battle/match before the last one and yet win the war/championship. (7.5/10)

Das weiße Band (The White Ribbon) (2009): Modeled on the Twin Peaks TV series, this critics' fave about the daily violence in 1914 smalltown Germany presents the stereotypes about the babbits' badness ad nauseam, complete with a boy's hands getting tied to the bedposts because he maturbated, etc., etc. Also presents a strong case against the view that if you shoot a film in colour and then print it black and white, it's going to look good anyway, so you don't have to pay any attention to the cinematography. However, given the quick succession of scenes and the above-average acting, the film is nonboring most of the time. What do we make of this? 4/10, I guess.

16/08/2009

Mischmetapher des Monats

Das ist Peer Steinbrück, das Thema ist: Inflationsgefahr nach der Wirtschaftskrise. Zumindest dem Kontext nach zu urteilen; ich habe keine Ahnung, was der Mann sagen will.

19/06/2009

Academia Quote of the Day

Wikipedia informs us:

Kremlin is a board game parody of Soviet government.

[...]

Each player controls a number of "politician cards" depicting caricatures of Soviet politicians. These are arranged in a pyramid on the game board, representing a hierarchy of power. Players promote, demote and exile these politicians in order to maneuver their own politicians to the top of the pyramid. Each turn, the Party Chief "waves" from the rostrum during a parade in Red Square. If a player's politician waves three years (non-consecutive), that player wins. Additionally, politicians age and each year there is a chance they will die. If no player is able to wave three times, the player with the highest ranking politician wins at the end of the health phase of the 11th turn.

Tyler Cowen reports:

Yesterday I tried to play Kremlin with [colleagues] but I had to give up after thirty minutes. My head hurt and I was not motivated to impose interesting structure on the game as a life activity. I'm still looking for a simple model of my failure. One hypothesis is that anyone who deals with university administration, as I sometimes do, will have no marginal taste for playing Kremlin.

Have a great weekend, everybody! I'll watch Magnolia now. Haven't seen it since it hit the big screen and am pretty excited. Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy!

06/06/2009

The English Tradition of Teaching

From A.S. Byatt's Possession, which I'm about 70 pages into and think I really like (p. 26 in my edition):
Blackadder [...] noticed and corrected a phletora of errors, accompanying this correction with a steady series of disparaging comments on the declining standards of English education. In his day, he said, students were grounded in spelling and had learned poetry and the Bible by Heart. [...] But in the best English tradition he did not consider it his business to equip his deficient students with tools they had not got. They must muddle through in a fog of grumble and contempt.
Don't know whether this attitude is particularly common in England, but anyway, this is remindful of the madness that is the method by which universities choose their teachers. Imagine car dealerships selecting their sales personnel on the basis of how good applicants are at accounting and you get a rough idea.

11/02/2009

Stimmungskanone des Tages: A. Schopenhauer

Wer die Behauptung, daß in der Welt der Genuß den Schmerz überwiegt oder wenigstens sie einander die Waage halten, in Kürze prüfen will, vergleiche die Empfindung des Tieres, welches ein anderes frißt, mit der dieses andern.
(Paralipomena, § 149)

15/01/2009

Quote of the Day

Let them think what they liked, but I didn't mean to drown myself. I meant to swim till I sank - but that's not the same thing.

- Joseph Conrad

23/09/2008

Quote of the Day

Intervewer: Why do rock stars date models so often?

Michael Hutchence: Because they can.

If you teach the concept of opportunities and restrictions, this one may come in handy.

10/07/2008

The Best Sentences I've Read in a Long Time

[T]he statement "All models are wrong, but some are useful" is itself a model (of an epistemological system, with many competing models) and thus is paradoxical, being true only if it isn't. Moreover, although it asserts directly that some models are useful and indirectly that others are not, the statement tells as [sic] nothing as to which is which, so it is not, itself, useful.
Kawoom!

Read the whole thing here.

16/04/2008

Feminism Quote of the Day

"I'm not a feminist at all: I like to dress up."

- Pamela Anderson

(Seen about ten years ago on MTV; exact wording may not be correct.)

05/04/2008

Quote of the Day

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge."

- Charles Darwin

03/03/2008

In der Metaphernkiste im Dunklen daneben gegriffen

Heiko Neugebauer kommentiert Werder Bremen - Borussia Dortmund im Radio (aus dem Gedächtnis zitiert):

...Markus Rosenberg, der spielt heute wie auf Amphetamin, also, äh... ich meine die homöopathische Variante natürlich, was man in der Apotheke kaufen kann, ganz legal, der Schwede...